Audio
Self
Control
“No matter the cause, the source,
the reason; it merely explains the behaviour, it does not excuse it”
Del
Mathison
Research and scientific investigations
continue in the search for connections between behaviour and neurophysiology. If unfortunately, this is to provide
plausible reasons, mitigation and possible excuses, then all is in vain.
The human brain is the single most
powerful ‘thing’ on the face of the planet. Not weapons of
destruction, terrorism, governments, multi-national companies, media, fame or
fortune.
The brain & minds of the
individual as a single entity or as a part of a collective, have devised, developed, created and invented all that
we now take for granted and much of that we fear.
The essence of the mind’s
functioning lies not in its neurophysiology. It lies in its capacity to undertake the most enduring and unique
facets of existence; the capacity for CHOICE. When all is stripped away and laid bare; and our views simplified by
the focus shifting to basic, fundamental and easily understood principles and concepts of life, this fact
remains.

“What lies in our power to do, it lies in our power not to
do”
Aristotle
Our world implies choice; it is
identified through vocabulary and instruction. Yes,No; Right, Wrong; Good, Bad; On, Off; Right,
Left; Stop, Go……. Generally speaking we function, not with any grey
areas of ‘maybes’, but very specific,
clear ‘black &
white’ rules. It is reflected in society’s laws, in
businesses’ ‘codes
ofconduct’ and even in the sporting arena. In
the latter, technology is being increasingly utilized to make the necessary distinctions for decision
clarification. The ball was either grounded or not; the player was off-side or on-side, and so
on.
We might not all agree with the
various laws, rules & regulations, though we all must abide, or bear the consequences of not doing
so.
The Rugby League player and others
involved with the sport should be highly aware of the need to ‘play by the rules’ and execute ‘self discipline’. The game itself, involving training
& preparation and on-field performance hinges on these factors. When someone is capable of employing self
discipline in relation to training and physical preparation, then how is this ‘self discipline’ sometimes not exhibited in social existence? If a player is able to muster
considerable ‘self
restraint’ on the field despite provocation & hostility, then why
do we not see the same restraint & control ‘off the field’?

“Temptations come, as a general rule, when they are
sought”
Margaret Oliphant
On a more personal and singular
level, the individual also has decision making capacity and responsibility; not only to the larger society, their
employers, family, friends or teammates, but more importantly, to themselves. Whilst generally easier to initiate
choice automatically and without ‘decision-making’ in respect to rules &
regulations, it becomes infinitely more difficult with respect to one’s own mind and the associated thoughts,
beliefs, attitudes and behaviours.
Self control is that which applies
to choice & the execution of decision making. The term can be defined as ‘the act of denying yourself; controlling your
impulses’ or ‘resolutely controlling your own behaviour’. Other terms
often used are ‘self discipline’,
‘self denial’, self command’, ‘self restraint’, ‘will-power’, ‘self-will’. They all imply the utilization of the same internal, psychological mechanism; that which
controls, regulates, restrains or tethers the emotions & desires, thoughts & impulses that provide
impediments to successful personal & societal functioning.
It is easy to understand what it
means; much more difficult to undertake its’ meaning.
“I count him
braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies.
The hardest victory is the victory over
Self”
Aristotle
Before going any further, it is
important to recognize that there are certainly those for whom self control or impulse control is more difficult.
Biological and physiological impediments through genetics, illness, disorders, disease, developmental deficiencies
and injury can make self control almost impossible. Medical & pharmacological intervention and behavioural
management strategies may need to be employed with such individuals. For these, however, there are clear,
identifiable reasons for the behavioural anomalies and afflicted impulse control. For the majority, particularly
those who manage to function adequately within mainstream society, and for whom no evidence of physiological
disruption to ‘executive
functioning’ in the brain exists, the capacity for self control
remains.
Despite the difficulties some
experience, there are also instances where individuals have risen above their overt impediments and disadvantaged
conditions, to succeed in life by employing self discipline or self control and defying the experts or others who
believed it to be impossible.
We marvel at these folk; they evoke
in us strong emotional and sometimes tearful responses because of their remarkable achievements, yet for
many ‘normal’, ‘physically well’ individuals simple self control is seen as ‘too hard’ and therefore neglected. Perhaps life is so structured and
relatively ‘easy’, without constant struggle and those areas
requiring self discipline will possibly disrupt the status quo of one’s
existence.
“He who conquers others is strong; he who conquers himself is
mighty”
Lao-Tzu
Western civilization has certainly
contributed to problems with self control. As mentioned in the forward to this book, we live in
a ‘fast
food’ society and have developed a ‘fast food’ mentality. Effort is not required for many aspects of our life. Why bother cooking a meal,
when you can heat up a frozen one or drive through and collect. Why bother sorting out problems that might cause
low mood or frustration when you can ‘pop a pill’ or temporarily block it out
by ‘having a
fewdrinks’.
Unfortunately this phenomenon has
the capacity to carry over into other aspects of our lives. This is evidenced by many of the excesses and abuse of
substances, where restraint and ‘controlled decision making’ is seemingly
forsaken.
“He that would be superior to external influences must first
become superior to his own passions”
Samuel
Johnson
There is a huge quantity of material
relating to behaviour & self control. ‘Classical & Operant conditioning’, ‘culture & behaviour’, ‘Personality & self
control’ are but some. Many theories and practices centre
on ‘behaviour
modification’ and relate to external methods of developing
appropriate responses & behaviours in the individual. Rugby League
employs ‘fines’ as a type of behaviour modification strategy, and realistically so, given the issues the
governing bodies and clubs are confronted. The problem with most of the literature and methodologies is the
intrinsic nature of ‘self
control’; the most important word is ‘SELF’.
The reasons why we need a structured
society with its many laws and regulations is largely attributed to requirement of order & appropriate,
acceptable behaviour. Without these, chaos & anarchy will result. Why? Because individual human beings have
varying degrees of ‘self
control’ and need this control externalized for their own
good.
“Freedom is not produced by a full enjoyment of what is desired,
but by controlling that desire”
Epictetus
For ‘self control’ to be effective and ‘real’ or ‘genuine’, there must be the application of
the following key elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
Recognition or acknowledgment of the personal
problem
2.
Acceptance of the need to make changes & the choice
to ‘change’
3.
Decision to purposefully, deliberately & consciously seek the
method by which this
change can
be facilitated
4.
Decision to apply discipline, focus & sincerity toward their
goal
5.
Active undertaking of strategy
chosen
6.
Utilisation of ‘feedback’ from
others as a means of monitoring progress &
success
7.
Acceptance of minor setbacks or flaws,
combined with continued determination to
succeed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedback is incredibly important to
the development and maintenance of ‘selfcontrol’. The sources of this feedback are many and
varied. Family, friends, teammates, media, general public, employers, coaches, CEOs, those within clubs and
administrative entities; they are all sources of both positive and negative feedback and will effect how the
individual proceeds in their quest for improved, altered behaviour and the self discipline required to attain
this.
There are many examples within the
area of sport that relate to ‘Self
Control’ and the success that follow.
Perhaps one of the most telling
illustrations of both ‘Self
Control’ & ‘Loss of SelfControl’ is that which occurred in the famous ‘Rumble in the Jungle’ on 30th October 1974, in the Zaire.
Muhammad Ali was attempting to
regain the undisputed heavyweight championship title from the younger, fitter & more powerful George
Foreman.
Most pundits & boxing
aficionados expected Foreman to win, given his awesome punching power. What transpired baffled the
experts.
Ali, knowing full well that he could
not compete with George with his usual method or on equal footing, employed a strategy which became known
as ‘rope a
dope’. He allowed the younger Foreman to punch him relentlessly, covering
up as much as he could and occasionally responding with a few ‘telling blows’ of his own. He further let Foreman have him on the ropes where this onslaught could
continue and periodically challenged George to ‘hit him harder’. He made derogatory and inflammatory remarks in the clinches; sarcastically
smiling.
The end result was a tired, battered
& bruised Foreman who’d lost his way, lost his ‘cool’,
lost his plan and ultimately lost the fight. Ali had unexpectedly triumphed with supreme self control &
discipline and causing Foreman to lose his ‘SelfControl’.
Foreman himself stated after the
fight that ‘Ali had not won it,
but rather he had lost it’.
I’m certain that there are many who
play and have played Rugby League can cite examples of being taunted or challenged by opposition players
(particularly in scrums) and who have similarly ‘lost their cool’. The aim of the player involved may be to
receive a penalty or have player ‘binned’ or ‘sent off’. There are players of the past that were well renowned for their skill at getting the
opposition riled to the point of losing composure, game plan execution & forfeiting of
penalties.
“Anger is only one letter short of
Danger”
Anonymous
The modern day player is generally only
too aware of ‘sledging’ and certainly is able to maintain
realistic self control. Many times it occurs in both teams; sometimes there’s a melee of sorts, though most state
the usual ‘what happens on the
field, stays on the field’. They can be teammates in representative
teams, though opposing each other in club games. Arthur Beetson’s famous hit on Mick Cronin in the very first State
of Origin didn’t affect their friendship and was seen for what it was; a part of the ferocity & genuineness of
the contest.
This is acceptable, to a point,
during the game; not so when ‘out
& about’. If a player thinks that ‘what happens in the pub or club, stays in the pub or
club’, they are sadly mistaken. Pubs, clubs, nightspots, footpaths, public
venues are not for gladiatorial exploits or confrontation. Any pugilism displayed in these situations will be
viewed negatively. You may be taunted or abused by some ‘drunken half-wit’ in a pub; so what. Who is he to you and why do his comments require an aggressive response?
If restraint can be shown during a game of football, then surely the same self discipline is able to be displayed
socially.
"To function successfully in our complex world
it is necessary for us to possess the capacity not only to express our
anger, but also not to
express it"
M Scott
Peck

“He who angers you, conquers
you”
Elizabeth Kenny
The ‘lost art of self control’ has led many to fall. Most, if not all, of society’s ills could be minimized by thoughtful
execution of this very vital psychological function. Lives are lost through accidents, drug & alcohol use & abuse, suicide etc. Lives are ruined by
the secondary effects of poor or absent ‘self control’; relationships, families, employment and crime & antisocial
behaviour.
It’s not that it is absent, nor that
it is unachievable; it is simply that many choose not to make the decision to employ it in their lives. Perhaps
there is no ‘feel
good’ factor; or any positives are not ‘immediate’ enough for gratification purposes.
Eventually, ‘self control’ does occur. It must. The problem is the damage to the individual concerned and the
peripheral and consequential effects prior to the realization of its importance. The earlier one starts to embrace
the ‘art of
selfcontrol’ the earlier one’s life
improves.
Impediments to the execution of ‘Self
Control’
All the factors listed below involve
effects related to executive functioning within the brain, and more particularly the ‘frontal lobe’. Impulse control, inhibition & disinhibition, rational thought & cognitive processes are
those aspects of the mind that provide impediments to ‘self control’.
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Self Control emanates from
within an individual
·
Self Control involves making
a ‘choice’
·
Self Control cannot be achieved
without ‘effort’, ‘discipline’, ‘honesty’ &
‘commitment’
·
If ‘Self
Control’ is not employed, external
agencies or society will
provide the control the individual is seemingly unable or unwilling to
accept
·
Self Control
is ‘positive’ and
will achieve positive results
·
Self Control is necessary in every
facet of existence
·
Self Control
or ‘lack of’, correlates
directly with exhibited behaviour
·
Self Control will enhance quality of
life, improved relationships, vocational &
sporting success, health & well being (both
physically & psychologically)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Without discipline, there is no life at
all”
Katherine Hepburn
For your viewing pleasure...'The Rumble in the Jungle"
Print this page
home
kickoff.net.au
©2008 Waldel Pty Ltd
|